Editorial policy

Urban Screen Review aims to make specific, readable claims about public screens and the places around them. We keep evidence, interpretation and uncertainty distinct, and revise the record when a material error comes to light.

Accuracy and context

We check names, dates and factual claims against suitable source material before publication. A description of one display or setting is not presented as proof of a general trend. Where evidence is incomplete or an interpretation is debatable, we say so and avoid stating more than the available material supports.

Independence and interests

Editorial decisions are made for the reader, not to secure favourable treatment for a product, venue or organisation. Contributors and partners must disclose relevant interests. Partnership arrangements do not buy editorial approval, and material supplied by an interested party is treated as a source to assess, not as independent verification.

Corrections

Readers can report a suspected error through the Contact page. We review the specific point and amend material errors with a clear correction or note where appropriate. We do not silently change a substantive claim in a way that obscures what was corrected.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid or otherwise arranged partner material is clearly labelled as such and kept distinct from independent editorial coverage. Some illustrations may be generated with artificial intelligence; when used, they are identified so readers can distinguish illustrative imagery from documentary evidence.